A recently published study has established a correlation between Vitamin B12 intake and mathematical and speech abilities. Expectant mothers whose intake of the Vitamin is low, may adversely affect their children’s ability to develop mathematical as well as speech abilities.
Professor Jean Golding conducted the study together with a team from Bristol University. Data referred to in the research was from a well-known health study referred to as Children of the 90s (ALSPAC).
The ALSPAC study collected the diet details of about 14,000 women who were pregnant. ALSPAC was conducted in Bristol, UK.
The longitudinal study followed up on the children and tested their abilities multiple times as they grew. Nutrition research that was published provides results of comparing the children’s abilities to the level of Vitamin B12 intake of their mothers.
Professor Golding went on to explain that most of the nutrients ingested by mothers during pregnancy are beneficial to the baby’s brain. In turn, the child’s educational and intellectual abilities improve when they are still young. However, there are questions concerning Vitamin B12 and whether it has the same effect.
Foods rich in Vitamin B12 include milk, eggs, meat, fish, cheese and some breakfast cereals. Marmite is great for vegetarians and vegans because it contains adequate B vitamins including B12. Using 29 separate test results, researchers found 26 that differed with Vitamin B12 levels. This was a far greater number than earlier expected.
However, when it comes to 9 separate factors, women with low vitamin B12 diet were different from others in the population. Taking these factors into account, residual effects dependent on socioeconomic measures like social class were absent.
The 9 variables were then taken into consideration during the assessment of the mother’s diet and its possible effects on her unborn child’s future abilities.
As much as things like IQ aspects, spelling and reading may be influenced by other background factors there were 6 associations that could not be explained by other factors.
The 6 associations showed that children who were born to women with low intake of the Vitamin during pregnancy were more likely to have a poor vocabulary at age 2. Their ability to combine words by 38 months was equally reduced. By age 6 the intelligibility of their speech was still poor. But that was not all.
Between ages 4 and 6, 8-9 and 10-11, they were more likely to have poor mathematical comprehension. Additionally, at age 13 they risked failing their national mathematical examinations. Overall, there were no associations connected to mental arithmetic that indicated the exam results were due to a reasoning component. Instead, they were due to computational abilities.
The numbers in the outcome were (n=9140)24month vocabulary, (n=8833) word combination at 38 months, (n=7647) speech intelligibility at 72 months, at age 4 and 6 poor mathematical comprehension, (age 8-9(n=4093) and ages 10-11(n=6142) and (age 13(n=8215) failure on national mathematical test.
The professor explained how the study concluded that if expectant mothers had low Vitamin B12 intake, this would negatively impact the neurocognitive development of their children.
This was particularly damaging for their mathematical and certain speech abilities. He added that the results were intriguing, but still needed further confirmation by other studies. He continued to encourage expectant mothers to consume a varied diet.
Is the New Appetite-Controlling Drug the Answer to Obesity?
Weekly semaglutide injections have helped patients lose more than 15kgs. Might this be a magic bullet in the fight against obesity?
We need efficient ways to treat and prevent obesity, even as we fight COVID-19. 29% of women and 26% of men in the UK, according to NHS in data published in 2020 May, were presumed to be obese. These individuals had a body mass index higher than 30.
The situation has now gotten worse thanks to a widespread lockdown-related gain in weight. Obese patients are not only likely to die due to COVID-19; but even worse, University of Glasgow researchers’ recent estimates suggest that obesity might have overtaken smoking as a cause of ill health in Scotland and England.
A healthy balanced diet and suitable physical exercise could prevent weight gain. But this is not considered an effective treatment against obesity. Consuming a very low-calorie diet of not more than 1,000 kcal a day might result in losing about 10 to 15kgs within 12 weeks.
A more modest, cautious calorie restriction prescribed by several commercial slimming plans could cause an average annual weight loss of about 7kgs. However any weight lost through these methods can be regained. And you need another approach to keep the wright off.
To date, various drugs formulated to treat obesity are either inefficient in clinical practice or have harmful side effects like anal leakage or higher blood pressure. Bariatric surgery is the only reliable treatment for critical obesity at the moment, but long-term side effects and risks accompany it.
A series of peptide hormones regulate energy expenditure and appetite. These hormones are released in the intestine. Bariatric surgery works because it changes the gut response to food intake and how it communicates with the brain.
Specifically, glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) is produced in the ileum in the last section of small intestines. GLP-1 responds to foods containing carbohydrates. Insulin synthesis is thereby promoted and secretion by the pancreas, but it affects the stomach by reducing the digestive system movements and secretion of acid.
The UK researchers published their findings on semaglutide in the New England Journal of Medicine led by John Wilding, in February. They found that a drug mimicking GLP-1 that was initially intended for diabetes treatment caused considerable weight loss in type 2 diabetes patients.
The researchers worked with 1,962 patients, of whom 75% were female. Of these, 13% were Asian, 6% black, and 75% white. Their average body mass index was 38. Patients were randomly divided into 2 equal groups. One group received semaglutide weekly injections, while the control group received placebo injections for 68 weeks. Both groups got lifestyle advice and diet.
The semaglutide group lost an average of 15.3kgs in contrast to 2.6 from the control group. The treatment effect difference in the two groups was 12.7kgs weight loss.
The treatment as successfully reduced blood pressure by 5.1mmHg, and the patients reported better physical functioning. The treatment’s major side effects included nausea, diarrhea, and occasional vomiting. And to those on active treatment, there were more frequent gastrointestinal disorders. Of more concern may be the accelerated danger of pancreatitis and gallbladder disease.
As these high-quality trials show, semaglutide causes remarkable weight loss compared to other drugs tested so far. What happens after the treatment ends is uncertain. Preventing the weight from piling back on is a great challenge, and the lesson learned from bariatric surgery is that patients should avoid sugar-sweetened beverages and unhealthy snacking. Smaller portions of calorie-dense foods help.
The research findings need to be confirmed with a more ethnically diverse population with a higher proportion of males. From a practical standpoint, the drug injection’s weekly requirement is more likely to curb a more significant rollout of the treatment. Oral preparations of the drug are still under trials.
While semaglutide appears promising as an obesity treatment, it is not exactly a magic bullet. We should continue to promote a healthy lifestyle as well as discourage unhealthy eating habits that lead to obesity.
Digital Health Technology for better Medical Nutrition Therapy
Most cases of disability and early death have their root cause in a poor diet. This is a global phenomenon. This means that improving diet can prevent most premature deaths.
According to recent research, Covid-19 patients who have dietary problems experience poorer outcomes.
A balanced diet does more than just help keep diabetes, cancer, and heart disease at bay, it also helps you fight off Covid-19.
Diet therapy helps people to prevent disease, as well as manage and treat illnesses. This includes acute and chronic diseases.
MNT (Medical Nutrition Therapy)
Treatment with Nutrition and Diet
Medical Nutrition Therapy means treating injuries, illnesses, and health conditions with diet and nutrition. MNT is an effective treatment for a range of conditions; from depression to HIV and kidney disease.
Even though researchers have proved that MTN works to treat chronic illnesses, MNT services are not widely accessible. Many patients cannot access it; either because it is too expensive or simply not available for them.
One study that focused on nutrition support for diabetes type 2 patients under Medicare found that not more than 4% benefited from MNT in the first year of their diagnosis.
Applying Digital Health Technology in the Service of MNT
Digital Health Technology has the potential to make MNT accessible to more people than ever before. Besides expanding availability, Digital Health Technology can provide the service in a more precise and individualized way.
We can now use both active and passive data collection to track, monitor, and analyze personal health by, for example, monitoring heart rates with smartwatches or logging in a 5-mile walk using a mobile app.
At least a fifth of America uses either a health app or a smart device to monitor their health. Users can choose from more than 300,000 apps on the market for health tracking.
The latest technologies like big data and machine learning can analyze data in real-time and present an opportunity to transform nutrition management.
With individual data such as meal patterns and symptoms, medics can apply machine learning and big data analysis to come up with evidence-based Medical Nutrition Therapy recommendations fast.
This will enable us to gain a deeper understanding of how diet influences improved disease treatment, management, and prevention.
Using mobile phones to make the technology accessible to more patients will allow them to benefit from MNT and access continual medical support wherever they are.
These technologies are compatible with machine learning and big data. They can make Medical Nutrition Therapy better and more accessible than ever.
Mobile phones can help patients take charge of their care, to access 24/7 medical support no matter where they are.
A single digital health service can integrate all these tools and services to make MNT more accessible financially by allowing them to access the therapy without having to pay for an in-person consultation.
Over time, the technology can minimize the ravages of disease, save lives, and reduce health services expenditure to the tune of billions of dollars.
Individualized MNT Advice
By building a single platform that continuously analyzes data across different locations and demographics, we can understand the role of diet in causing disease and altering the impact of the disease on the human body.
Vulnerable population groups like older people and the chronically ill also stand to benefit from such a platform.
With greater resources dedicated to data analysis, it will be possible to identify risk factors for chronic illnesses a lot earlier and to prescribe dietary interventions early enough to prevent and sometimes even reverse diseases.
Because people’s nutritional needs and preferences evolve with time, people need a platform that can grow and adapt to their changing needs over time, too. AI and machine learning will enable the platform to gradually develop a better understanding of user’s nutritional needs.
This kind of platform will use algorithms to spot and track patterns that reflect individual traits in behavior, biology, as well as physiology. These insights will help the tools to decide on the best diet for individual users, designed for their conditions, genetics, and even lifestyle.
Machine learning, as well as analysis of big data, can help users to understand the diet needs of individuals and to make more precise dietary prescriptions.
The technology can make clinical care better by recognizing the way drugs, nutrition, and disease interact and coming up with more precise MNT prescriptions.
We are on the cusp of a new technological era of more personalized nutritional services than ever.
You might Want to Choose between your Pacemaker and your iPhone
Apple has some heart wrenching information for you. And we do mean that in the literal sense. You might have read a lot of dubious reports about the power of cellphones to cause brain cancer. This is the real deal.
Apple says that their offering Apple 12 may harm your heart.
In a warning released on January 23rd, Apple says that iPhone magnets may have an effect on medical devices including defibrillators and pacemakers.
1.3 million Americans are using pacemakers now, and more and more start using them each year.
Defibrillators are in widespread use too, though precise statistics are a little harder to find.
According to Apple’s warnings, certain items within iPhones such as radios, magnets, and what they call ‘components.’ These items emit electromagnetic energy and this could alter the functioning of these lifesaving medical devices.
“These magnets and electromagnetic fields might interfere with medical devices,” reads the advisory.
The report hints at the culprit by mentioning that ‘iPhone 12 models contain more magnets than prior iPhone models.’
Apple explains that sensors within medical devices like pacemakers and defibrillators may react when they are close to radios and magnets.
iPhone users are advised to keep their iPhone accessories away from their implanted medical devices – at least 6-12 inches.
Shirt pockets, coat breast pockets, and even pants pockets are now clearly unsafe places to keep an iPhone 12. This warning means that people who have implanted medical devices may find it dangerous to walk around with an iPhone 12. How do you walk with a phone while keeping it as far away from you as possible?
According to an article published in January 2021’s edition of the Heart Rhythm Journal says that external magnets may cause defibrillators to suspend ‘high voltage shock therapy for ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation.’
An experiment found that as long as the iPhone 12 remained over the patient’s left chest area and close to the defibrillator, ICD therapies stopped. The same thing happened when the iPhone 12 was moved to other parts of the chest.
This means that iPhone 12 has the power to harm patients by halting vital and life-prolonging therapy.
Upper pockets were found to be the worst places to keep an iPhone 12 for patients who have installed pacemakers and defibrillators.
According to the journal, even fitness tracker wristbands have been found to interfere with defibrillators as far as 2.4cm or 1 inch away.
While we do appreciate the warning, we feel it would be a lot more helpful for Apple to provide a solution. Like a different version of the phone, or maybe a protective casing around the phone that blocks magnetic signals.
Home4 months ago
Best Science Board Games
Health & Fitness4 months ago
8 Ways Technology Is Improving Your Health
Medical4 months ago
Identifying the Sound of a Covid-19 Cough with Artificial Intelligence
Automotive4 months ago
Everything you need to know about turbochargers
Gadgets4 months ago
Wearable Devices to be Fitted with Tiny Micro Supercapacitor
Nature4 months ago
Plastic ‘Spider’s Web’ Solution for Smashed Smartphone Screen
Medical4 months ago
Nurami Medical lands $6M making regenerative bandages for post-surgery recovery
Environment4 months ago
Farming Could be Transformed by Self-Watering Soil